- Aggressive tax optimisation: what is the best ESG approach?
Aggressive tax optimisation: what is the best ESG approach?
Friday 30 March 2018
Research / Market
Between 100 and 240 billion euro per year. This is what aggressive tax planning costs governments in lost revenue1. Such practices, designed to enable companies to avoid tax by using and abusing the legislation in place, have flourished in recent years. They have been supported by globalisation of communications and the growing dematerialisation of the economy. These practices have also become more complex and industrialised, with the help of tax advisory companies that are increasingly professionalised. Companies today are therefore encouraged to create financial flows that enable profits to be transferred to zones with tax advantages, for example by creating companies that hold patents or brands or by using asymmetry between local legislation to benefit from double non-taxation.
Emerging Markets Charts & Views - Seek opportunities, but be aware of short-term volatility
Emerging markets (EM) started 2019 on a strong footing and, as a result, some excessive valuation gaps have been partially closed.
Brexit: an agreement is now more likely, but be aware of a no deal risk, not priced in
The concept of factor investing and the debate around passive and active management has emerged since the end of the 2000s and has completely changed the landscape of equity investing.
Gold in central banks' asset allocation
After a long lacklustre period during the 1980s and 1990s, the price of gold has picked up significantly since the new millennium, and central banks, after having steadily reduced their allocation to gold, have resumed their gold purchases.